Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by pjmlp 739 days ago
While others have, more expressive languages than Go, that compiled blazingly fast in 1990's hardware, with more features than Go will ever get.
1 comments

I've never understood why people think "more features" is a flex. "Faster compile times" isn't even the primary benefit of fewer features, it's just gravy. More features, even with fast compile times, is a failure (which is probably why most of those "more expressive languages" are no longer with us unless one includes the JIT languages and--disingenuously--only measure the AOT compilation).

EDIT: wow, a downvote within literally 2 seconds of posting!

Do those languages command even a single percentage of marketshare combined?