|
|
|
|
|
by silisili
739 days ago
|
|
I know this comment is tongue in cheek, but I still disagree. When you purchase a house, you look at principal, taxes, PMI, and insurance before making a decision. If you're responsible, I guess. If your little city blows up, and your property value in the market is now 3x what it was, why should you be punished and even forced out if you can't afford the new taxes? New buyers do the same math, and decide they can afford it.. Yes they're paying more, but voluntarily on a likely overpriced asset. I'm not saying the original owners should just pay less and that's fair, screw the new buyers. I just think the increase should be capped realistically. |
|