|
|
|
|
|
by _DeadFred_
729 days ago
|
|
Again zero actually said just assertions to challenge the system. For the miller, yes (kindof), for the person who couldn't afford a mill, no. Their best hope was to sell their kid off as a 'apprentice' to the miller. Of course the miller could only expand/improve their setup as much as their own skillset allowed, greatly reducing productivity which, spread out across the entire economy, provided a much lower standard of living. |
|