|
|
|
|
|
by wizzwizz4
732 days ago
|
|
> One possibility would be to say that if something is currently widely used in some significant (think 5%) portion of the industry then we allow it, We could say "if it was used in the ancestral environment for similar purposes, and is not known to be harmful". Much of that stuff is bad, but our bodies have mitigations for it. (e.g. tannins leached from wooden bowls: harmful in principle, but we can metabolise them so it's fine) |
|