|
|
|
|
|
by danenania
734 days ago
|
|
Thank you for the post--it's really interesting to hear that feedback about your workflow. > There's no way it would implement real features Could you say more about this? While Plandex certainly does have limitations, I've been using to add some fairly complex features to Plandex itself. That said, I know there are conditions that can make it not perform well. Could you maybe talk a bit more about what kind of code base this is and what problems you tend to run into? Thanks again. |
|
There's too much subtlety and home-grown weirdness at this point to build "real" code, although I haven't really pushed it either. We're an internal application that mostly is consumed by other parts of our company, and so most of our problems are nitpicky workflow issues more than technical coding.
I think where Plandex is great is the mundane junk around the edges of a large system like this. Something I haven't tried but am pretty sure would work well is building a new API connector by loading a current API client into context, the docs for a new API to implement, and then iterating a bit to generate the new one in the right style.
I could also probably get further by having a 'style guide' markdown document I load into context too. Something like that would be handy for basically any LLM based coding assistant.