|
|
|
|
|
by tr3ntg
742 days ago
|
|
They didn't have a choice. Doing everything on-device would result in a horrible user experience. They might as well not participate in this generative AI rush at all if they hoped to keep it on-device. Which would have looked even worse for them. Their brand is equally about creativity as it is about privacy. They wouldn't chop off one arm to keep the other, but that's what you're suggesting they should have done. And yes, I know generative AI could be seen specifically as anti-creativity, but I personally don't think it is. It can help one be creative. |
|