Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by defrost 744 days ago
> Men, to be clear, are socially permitted far less peacocking with clothing

Various points in history beg to disagree.

Doublets, ruffs, codpieces, high heeled shoes, etc didn't come cheap.

1 comments

Even at our point in history, there is at least one watch brand which advertises with the message that this particular toy[0] is one you are merely the custodian of until you bequeath it to your successor[1].

[0] the difference between men and boys is how many people are on the payroll for taking care of their toys.

[1] for patina, rings beat timepieces, but those families aren't exactly a growth market, now are they?

Lagniappe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alBm88ZjMrc