> ... we have entered into a new long-term agreement with Apple that extends beyond 2040, continuing our longstanding relationship of collaboration with Apple and Apple’s access to the Arm architecture.
That's not even a contract but a public statement. A lawyer would wipe her ass with it.
We do not get to see the actual agreement, and this "access" could very well mean the RAND I mentioned, i.e. that they won't be arbitrarily denied a license.
Incidentally, the key word "license" is remarkably not included in the language used.
>agreement
and
>access to the Arm architecture.
Is vague language that could mean about anything.
E.g. it could mean RAND ("reasonable" and "non-discriminatory").
Namely, the parent specifically claimed:
>Apple has a licensing deal with ARM through 2040
The vague language is insufficient to support the claim.