Yeah, they did... but being blunt, IBM had 8 years to do a lot of damage. Not speaking of the engineers or the tech behind it, I'm talking about escalating the ad revenue and general junk on their website. MOST of the page load time on weather.com and AccuWeather is ad and tracking. It's an ungodly number of requests and will drain a data plan's usage limits surprisingly quickly.
Just opening weather.com will send almost 1000 requests , transfer 10.3MB. Every 30 seconds or so it will make about 300 requests + 2MB of transfer for new ads. It's... insane
Ads and cookies are hardly the worst thing that AccuWeather has done. They have been lobbying the federal government for 30 years to forbid NOAA from issuing forecasts at all. They want the government to pay for all the satellites and supercomputers, and they want all that data for free, but they want you to have to pay AccuWeather for forecasts.
In situations like this I feel that it is important to put a face to a name.
AccuWeather, a corporation like any other is made of people. These shortsighted decisions and shitty behavior are directly attributable to people who do them for selfish reasons.
So let's start talking about these people in the first person, not in the abstract.
Who is directly responsible for these atrocious actions and why do they stand to benefit from them?
and any info from Environment Canada, being packaged in a way that might compete, with the very same people using Environment Canada's free data for-profit.
Cries of "How can the Government compete with the private sector" are thrown around, always glossing over how that very data is often sourced from the Government. Pathetic. Leeches of the worst kind.