[al_borland]

If you want Linux isn't "just working" over time, give macOS a look. My dad was a lifelong Windows user and sung the praises of Microsoft's monopoly over the industry. As much as he was disappointed and upset with Borland Software dying off, he thought the benefit of a single document format everyone used was a huge benefit for the industry early on when Word started to take over, and by extension all of the standardization through a single player rather than through actual standards. He always said it worked great and didn't see why he'd ever want to change, or why anyone would want anything different.

He ended up switching to Apple around 15 years ago after a series of bad experiences. He was very nervous about it, and really hedged his bets early on. It took him some time to get used to how the OS worked, to find new apps to replace some that he had used since the Windows 3.1 days, and sort out his workflows. He eventually gave up his Windows VM when he realized the only thing he ever used it for was to run Windows Update.

I grew up on Windows, with the views from my dad instilled in me. In college I tried Linux and ultimately moved to the Mac about 21 years ago. I still used Linux on and off for the past 22 years (and currently have a music server running it). I do find Linux to still be much more finicky than macOS. No system is perfect, but macOS is more of a "just works" operating system than Linux (imo), likely due to the focus on polishing that last 10% of the user experience, that never seems to get the attention it needs in Linux. While I am excited to see what Cosmic has to offer later this year on Pop OS, I'm always ending up having to deal with some level of nonsense, even my most recent install of Mint just last week had a few annoying things where things didn't work, and they should have worked.