[jsiepkes]

> Under the Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act it is illegal for HP to renege on their warranty unless the reason for warranty work is demonstrably due to the consumer's changes.

Aside from what would be morally right to do I doubt HP is legally compelled to repair it.

I'm guessing that since this was handled under "extended warranty" the rules of your "minimum legal warranty" don't apply since those have already expired. So the rules of the agreement of the "extended warranty" apply. Which as far as I know is basically just a sort of insurance product with it's own agreement. Guess it's a pretty safe bet the terms contain a clause about not allowing modifications to the product in any form.

[balozi]

A major vendor did something similar to us about a decade ago. Brand new notebooks bricked after the vendor's tech support directed us to install a "required" system update. Vendor claimed that they we're not liable for the damage and pointed to their End User Agreement and Warranty policy. Turns out they had clauses that stated that the vendor was not responsible for damage to devices caused by firmware or BIOS updates. We would later learn that the required system update included a BIOS update responsible for the damage. Its been over a decade since we've even considered a purchase from them again.