|
|
|
|
|
by qp11
737 days ago
|
|
More like they don't want to deal with drama when they have a whole lot of other headaches on their plate. Winds can change overnight. Like Churchill hitting peak support and popularity in 1945 but then he goes and looses the elections after the war. Why? Cause the support during the war was for one thing and the elections were about another. |
|
sure everyone wants to avoid "drama" but why doesn't that drama match with say ukraine war? we have whole tech companies supporting ukraine, rejecting russians, "we support ukraine" pins and banners all across the interwebs so its not like
https://about.fb.com/news/2022/02/metas-ongoing-efforts-rega...
https://about.fb.com/news/2023/10/metas-efforts-regarding-is...
read these two posts from meta.
in ukraine post, they are talking about mental health issues, "showing solidarity on Facebook: ", and "fundraising efforts" and "Increasing Our Support for Humanitarian Efforts:"
while in the second post, it is all about preventing hamas content or more appropriately, content that facebook deems "harmful" against israeli interests.
no solidarity with dead gazans or no humanitarian efforts, no fundraising