[tomjen3]

I realise this is a dangerous subject, but I am genuinly curious: given the business you run and the work you do for the Freebsd team, why would you object to using c++, but not c?

I could understand why you would object to both, but why only the lower level language.

[seiji]

Personally, I can't keep all of how C++ works in my brain at once. Most people end up limiting themselves to a "sane subset" of C++ to compensate for spec sprawl. But, everybody picks a different subset, so you can quickly stumble on things you think you know but don't work quite right when working on non-self-originated code.

[cperciva]

given the business you run and the work you do for the Freebsd team

Are you getting confused between tptacek and me?

[tptacek]

Hey, why don't you use C++? :)

[cperciva]

I think Tavis put it best: C is easier to audit because it's transparent. With C++ you can have innocuous-looking source code and have the compiler doing all sorts of crazy things behind your back.

[tptacek]

I don't work for the FreeBSD team.