[blueflow]

Yes and you can relay that authentication, too.

The same way the fake laptop can relay your password to me, i could also relay the generated TOTP code from the stolen laptop to the fake in front of you. As tried to convey, the fake laptop is basically a full MITM on your screen/keyboard.

Making a machine visuals non-reproducible helps that, but only if the attacker cannot easily switch the exterior parts (chassis, keyboard) between the two machines.

[Foxboron]

> The same way the fake laptop can relay your password to me, i could also relay the generated TOTP code from the stolen laptop to the fake in front of you. Also any authentication to generate that TOTP in the first place. As tried to convey, the fake laptop is basically a full MITM on your screen/keyboard.

This is a hollywood level threat scenario.

It involves the attacker having intimate familiarity with the operating system, and having to break inn twice to even get this attack done.

If you do put inn the effort then I deserve to be hacked and can pick up sheep farming in the country side.

[blueflow]

Why twice? You can keep the fake laptop.

The OS does not matter? Grab the video output via HDMI/DisplayPort and insert the keypresses via USB. Thats likely gonna work. Basically what modern KVM switches do. And setup the fake laptop as VNC client. Same tech that companies can use to remotely manage servers.

[Foxboron]

> The OS does not matter?

Of course it does. You are replaying the logos and screens.

> Grab the video output via HDMI/DisplayPort and insert the keypresses via USB. Thats likely gonna work. Basically what modern KVM switches do. And setup the fake laptop as VNC client. Same tech that companies can use to remotely manage servers.

You believe you can boot up an entire VNC client to display something that would take most machines under a second to display?

[blueflow]

> You are replaying the logos and screens

Which the real machine happily gives me via HDMI/DisplayPort.

> You believe you can boot up an entire VNC client to display something that would take most machines under a second to display?

Do i need to? That the user presses the power button does not mean the machine will freshly boot. It could also be an unsuspend/wakeup or some regular ACPI event if the machine is only appearing to be off.

[Foxboron]

> Do i need to? That the user presses the power button does not mean the machine will freshly boot. It could also be an unsuspend/wakeup or some regular ACPI event if the machine is only appearing to be off.

This is a completely imaginary scenario. I'd be amazed to see it pulled off.

EDIT: I hear Amazon is still getting pitches for Hacker 2. You might have a shot.

[orf]

OP is trying to say that this TPM TOTP approach doesn’t help verify a machine is legitimate if there is a possibility that the machine you’re using has been swapped with a malicious one.

This doesn't really mesh well with what the TPM-TOTP idea is trying to solve: trust in the machine you’re using.

Hyperbolic or fairly extreme-sounding scenarios are common when discussing this kind of thing, partly because it makes discussion about a fairly boring topic a little bit more interesting. Don’t get distracted by that.

That being said, using a TPM-based TOTP is pretty extreme sounding in and of itself.

[blueflow]

Windows Fastboot (active per default) is suspend disguised as shutdown:

https://www.windowscentral.com/how-disable-windows-10-fast-s...

[tiberious726]

There are like three operating systems in common use. An attacker being familiar with the one you use certainly isn't a "Hollywood level threat scenarios".

Buying the same model laptop and swapping it with your targets is an elementary level targeted attack