What you're saying very well seems like a threat. A threat of violence for speech.
That attitude defaults to better at violence in a particular context gets to impose their will. Or whoever has the security forces to back them out of an inferiority situation.
You miss the part when I can arbitrarily warn you about a lot of things myself and then use any interpretation of rule breaking on your part to attack you.
I know it may sound harsh but this is where many end up going so let's make it explicit.
That attitude defaults to better at violence in a particular context gets to impose their will. Or whoever has the security forces to back them out of an inferiority situation.
You miss the part when I can arbitrarily warn you about a lot of things myself and then use any interpretation of rule breaking on your part to attack you.
I know it may sound harsh but this is where many end up going so let's make it explicit.