Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by ggpsv 739 days ago
That is how it actually works in Spain. You must present the contract when you legally register as a citizen in the city's town hall.

That doesn't stop people from circumventing this requirement, on either side of the contract.

1 comments

Thanks for that info! So why is this such a big problem? Is it just that the government doesn't want to trust it's own records? If people are bypassing the law, I would think it reasonable to allow the consequences to transpire - eg evicted if you don't have a written contract.
As mentioned in other comments by Spaniards weighing in, it's not really a big problem as in that's happening all the time. It is a multi-faceted issue, and for some, a philosophical standpoint stemming from the economic crisis, gentrification and speculation, and related problems.

Take in mind that the post shared here is written by a company that provides listing services.

Housing is more of a right in Spain than in other countries, and at least in Catalonia, there is precedent that it supersedes property rights.

Ah, I see. The article was claiming it was "surging", but I guess it's hyperbolic advertising.
You'll understand the inevitable tension on policing this issue considering that a couple of years ago Spain passed a law that made access to adequate and dignified housing a constitutional right.
You are saying that as if it is never the owner's fault.

If your revenue is not enough to pay for an housing under regular contract but a shaddy owner allows you to pay a rent for the place so that he can bypass a number of regulations by pretending he has no tenants, would you choose living in the street or a car or would you accept it, hoping it is a temporary situation?

Most people would choose the later hence the way the laws are written. Landowners are usually the wealthy ones, so the less at risk of suffering.

There needs to be penalties on the landowner side too. The paper requirement should carry penalties enforced against them if they are violating it. This would be better than just a chance of pain from the eviction process. After all, if they are shady landlords they might push people out in other ways to avoid the eviction process currently anyways.
If you read through the article, it becomes a bit clearer exactly why it still happens.
I saw some of the different factors in the article but none of them seemed to really address the lack of checking a registered source of data for the leases and why they wouldn't be a good idea.