|
|
|
|
|
by Karrot_Kream
740 days ago
|
|
It often doesn't and a lot of historians are very aware of this. The wars of ASOIAF are brutal affairs which make no sense. The idea of total war didn't become a thing until much later on. This is just one example. Bret Devereaux talks about this on his blog [1] and other historians have stuff to say also. P.S. The comments on this thread are a tire fire. I feel like I'm reading random Twitter drive-by comments oh boy. [1]: https://acoup.blog/2019/05/28/new-acquisitions-not-how-it-wa... |
|
The idea of total war didn't become a thing until much later on.
Troy, Assyria, Babylon, Macedonia, Carthage, and Mesopotamia would like to have a word with you on that point. Or they would, if they hadn't been completely wiped out. The Mongol Hordes were known for total warfare. It was their whole spiel: join us, or be completely destroyed.
The very concept of not targeting civilian populations during warfare is so recent that there are people still alive today who were around when the idea was first proposed.