|
|
|
|
|
by eesmith
740 days ago
|
|
Which is why I said you changed the topic to something more defensible than the original comment. That isn't "devil's advocacy" but arguing for the sake of arguing. We see alcohol is used for business and social purposes, including Friday beer and pizza paid by the company, and conferences with beer and wine during receptions. If we accept the premise that "legitimate use cases" that "people will end up wanting .. later in life" justifies it being taught or allowed at school then when will we teach high schoolers to drink alcohol? |
|
Oh, I'm sorry, I thought this was a conversation. I didn't realize nobody was allowed to rebut you since you were just replying to one specific comment. /s
> If we accept the premise that "legitimate use cases" that "people will end up wanting .. later in life" justifies it being taught or allowed at school then when will we teach high schoolers to drink alcohol?
What are you even trying to say here? Drinking alcohol isn't a skill people need for anything productive. I'm almost 26 and I've never had an alcoholic drink.
> We see alcohol is used for business and social purposes,
Information technology is required for certain business processes to increase productivity. Alcohol is not. Your argument is either bad-faith or just poorly formed.
Drinking alcohol at work would more appropriately be compared to using social media at school (it's a social vice that doesn't help you practically). Not using phones in general.