[nasso_dev]

my understanding is that serenity will focus less on the web browser in the first place. it might just go back to being a simple html viewer with rudimentary js support?

my hope is that they take this as an opportunity to come up with a purpose built "web" stack for serenity? use it as an excuse to reinvent the web and "fix" the mistakes that were made? maybe by actually Putting Scheme In The Browser rather than js?

[robertlagrant]

They could put Scheme in the browser, but then what websites would work? How many have Scheme; zero? Have JS - almost all?

[0xDEAFBEAD]

I would argue WebAssembly is a better idea than Scheme.

[hazn]

you can have both! https://spritely.institute/hoot/