[vitiral]

Is every flat yet informative summary going to be accused of GPT now?

And no, way too concise to be GPT imo

[lyu07282]

> And no, way too concise to be GPT imo

That is funny, it was GPT4 over the video transcript

[vitiral]

damnit

[wavemode]

"accused" implies that it's a bad thing. I see nothing wrong with using AI for summarization.

But I also see nothing wrong with someone wanting to know, as a general disclaimer, whether a given text was human- or AI-generated. The passage does read to me very much like GPT's college essay-like speech patterns.