|
|
|
|
|
|
by tluyben2
744 days ago
|
|
|
There is a lot to learn from him; tiny binaries, super fast performance; programming style you like or don't, that's fine. To have a 200kb binary that's a programming language + database is very nice. It's great we can study a part of it and probably more in the future. We went overboard with bloating and complexity; it's good to be shown you can write current enterprise/commercial products that fits in the memory of an 80s homecomputer without changing your style of programming or tools you use for it. IMHO anyway. |
|
|
Imho software size should reflect complexity of the problem domain. Not arbitrary metrics like say, the capabilities of a system executing it.
So "Hello World!" should weigh in at mere bytes. Not KBs or even MBs.