Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by noman-land 751 days ago
Just because this stalking happens invisibly in the guts of a Javascript file it doesn't make it any different than following me around every street I walk down and noting down everything I look at.

Here's the metaphor. Google offers free video cameras to any person who wants them. The cameras collect thousands of data points about every single person who enters their field of view. The cameras pick up every movement on the streets, in the shops. Every word uttered. They note all conversations and relationships. They send this data into a central database where every person gets a lifetime profile where they are uniquely identified and where all the aggregate data across all the free cameras in the world is collated and stored together.

Google now has a moment by moment timeline of everyone in the world, updating in real time.

Now, using this cache of information, anyone can bid for my attention in real time as I go about my life. While I'm at the bank (website). While I'm at the bar (website). While I'm at the grocery store (website). While I'm at the library (website). Around every corner is a digital billboard that's watching what my hands are doing, where my eyes are looking, what I'm saying. It knows my name, where I'm from, what I do, and who my family is, and it wants to sell me something.

This world is grotesque to me. It's about much more than data breaches.

I didn't even get into the government overreach capabilities such a dataset would enable, nay, tempt.

2 comments

okay but you do realize they give you there products to use right. and you probably use them or at least use products that need them to function. thats the deal and i doubt anyone would rather it be for cash instead. i mean would you rather pay monthly for chrome or firefox? pay per google search. pay monthy for youtube. pay for android os. monthly for maps. hell google can stare at my naked ass all day for all i care id rather not pay for any of these things
I think anyone, given the choice, would rather pay for something with costs that are clear and up front, not buried in an evolving ToS that boils the frog.

You're welcome to make this Faustian bargain for yourself, but you don't get to make it for the rest of us, and neither does Google.

> id rather not pay for any of these things

...and many of us would simply rather not use Google products if that's the deal they're offering. Hence, the original article link.

So tl;dr the actual practical impact is just that you see more relevant ads when you’re visiting websites.
I understand the argument of “what’s the practical impact”

Practical impact is important to recognize but the concept of potential impact, otherwise known as risk, is most certainly valid; having the most intimate details of your identity stored outside of your own control can have profound risks for any bad actor especially when our methods of securing our identities haven’t kept up with the pace of it being collected.

No, the practical impact is the stalking, not what the fruits of that stalking are used for.