|
|
|
|
|
by lxgr
750 days ago
|
|
Even if that were true (I don't think it is): The more important distinction between humans and LLMs is accountability. If a customer support agent gives you incorrect information, you can often hold the company liable for it (assuming you can prove it; I suppose there's a reason for why companies prefer certain support channels over others). If an AI "lies" to you, you're largely on your own right now. |
|
Notwithstanding differences in jurisdiction, applying that idea to this case would rely on finding that Meta owed Gaudreau a duty of care that extended to the Meta AI chatbot.
It would be more difficult to make this claim if Gaudreau had asked the question of Google, since Google itself is not usually responsible for false information uncovered by its searches.