|
|
|
|
|
|
by flutas
748 days ago
|
|
|
> Their argument is that Grok should not be given a trademark beforehand due to this potential confusion. Groq says no such thing. Their two public things so far include 1) a company that rebranded to Groq Healthcare < 2 year after Groq launched (their trademark at the time had nothing to do with health, they then added it to their trdemark and tried to trademark the competitors name) 2) a C&D to twitter over the name |
|
|