|
|
|
|
|
|
by cess11
746 days ago
|
|
|
It differs from the RFC, notably "text" is valid JSON according to ECMA but not the RFC. I've come across JSON parsers stumbling on the bottom part of ASCII, for example. JSON -> internal representation -> JSON commonly leads to loss of information. Sure, protobuf is nice, but more limited in scope and closer to a JSON alternative than an XML alternative. I use JSON every other day and have been for decades. |
|
|