|
|
|
|
|
by bigfudge
749 days ago
|
|
Because once the current safety scrutiny has passed you might get more trips done by setting the ai to be more aggressive in traffic. Then you are into VW style software updates with a profit motive and no mechanism to hold them accountable? |
|
Like banning them altogether following a public outcry? That is the mechanism to hold them accountable.
Also in individual cases it will be very easy to sue them for accidents they caused or contributed to. Already is.
Where does this “no mechanism to hold them accountable” comes from?