|
|
|
|
|
by ncgl
753 days ago
|
|
I love stuff like this, but I can't help but wonder much of this is simply editorialization on top of natural selection. Do infected wolves really take more risks? Or are we just connecting two dots with a thin bro science understanding of evolution? It seems impossible to know when you're looking for a broad narrative that fits how genes are spread |
|
However, and maybe this is what you're getting at, it could be that risk-taking individuals are more likely to get infected with toxo? Telling the difference between those two ideas would be harder, although in lab rat experiments you could control for it.