long exposures don't inherently mean blurring. The camera or mount can move to track a moving object, keeping it sharp. Astrophotography has been and still is done without computational photography.
> and still is done without computational photography.
um, ackshully, lots of computational editing is being done now. The image of Sag A* was heavily computed. They are now having to use computed images to remove all of the made on earth objects in the sky from Starlink to planes. There's a lot of stuff done to astroimages now and computational editing is making its way there.
when i said that it is still done without computational editing, i didn't mean that all astrophotography is done without it. i means that some is done without it
um, ackshully, lots of computational editing is being done now. The image of Sag A* was heavily computed. They are now having to use computed images to remove all of the made on earth objects in the sky from Starlink to planes. There's a lot of stuff done to astroimages now and computational editing is making its way there.