[anigbrowl]

So many big tech companies are like this - suspending users for violating some term of a contract, but without saying what. Ostensibly this is hurt scammers but for more of the burden seems to fall on legitimate to users to the point that the companies themselves appear to be scamming their own userbase. It's long past time that regulators forced public-facing businesses to provide candor and allow for remedy when alleging contract violations. My whole adult life I've been hearing of or occasionally encountering companies using 'computer says no' as a way of ducking personal and professional responsibility toward customers.

Edit: A lot of people responding are missing OP's point. It's not that Stripe has made a decision about what kind of business they want to deal with (wholly legitimate), it's that they won't tell OP what part of their agreement Stripe considers to have been violated.

Mindlessly repeating that 'Stripe has the choice of with whom they do business' (which OP has never disputed) is just reflex behavior at best and shilling at worst. Either address the actual question raised by OP or don't comment.