|
|
|
|
|
by kohanz
757 days ago
|
|
Congratulations on building something of value and successfully selling it. It's quite the achievement and most don't get to this level. I do have to say, I was somewhat surprised by the low multiple on the valuation, but perhaps that's just what the range is for a business of this nature. We're spoiled in the world of software and recurring revenue. What about the tax implications of the sale. Have you figured out how much of the sale you'll be able to put in your pocket? |
|
>I do have to say, I was somewhat surprised by the low multiple on the valuation, but perhaps that's just what the range is for a business of this nature. We're spoiled in the world of software and recurring revenue.
Yeah, from what I've heard, SaaS businesses sell for a much higher multiple, often selling as a multiple of revenue rather than earnings.
The other thing that's really reduced valuations is interest rates. When interest rates were <1%, private equity was bidding up prices of businesses because it was a decent place to park money, but now that you can get 5.3% from a money market, the additional return from buying a business isn't worth the risk.
>What about the tax implications of the sale. Have you figured out how much of the sale you'll be able to put in your pocket?
Still working out the exact figure with my accountant. His expectation was that I'll keep a pretty large percentage after taxes because of Section 174. I had a large amount of expenses each year in software development from overseas contractors, and with Section 174 changes that went into effect in 2022, I had to amortize them over 15 years.[0] But with the liquidation of the company, I can count those expenses immediately, and they offset the income from the sale. So Section 174 is still a bad deal for software founders, but at least when you liquidate the company, you don't have to wait out the full 15 years of amortized expenses.
[0] https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/section-174/