Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by pbhjpbhj 750 days ago
Domains are cheap, don't serve content on an ad domain maybe?

Sounds like perhaps your task was to ensure a company's ads got through an adblocker?

2 comments

my task was to rectify an issue in one of these crowd sourced lists of ad servers.

they were blocking a whole domain instead of blocking the ad-serving subdomain.

the issue was rectified, the main domain was replaced by the ad-serving subdomain.

Still, as pbhjpbhj suggested, if I were publishing both content and ads, I would consider publishing the ads on a different domain (not just a subdomain) to reduce technical issues. Domains with ugly names are very cheap.
of course, and this is a valid proposal. but that was outside the remit.
You could be right but you are definitely jumping to a conclusion here.

The default lists used by uBlock for example include things like error tracking telemetry, Sentry for example.

I can see why people want to block that stuff (privacy) but it’s not exactly an “ad”