Thank you for your constructive feedback, what you’re saying about v is correct but only for a single observer, since information already exists and can only be realized.
From this, naturally, dv/dt is intuitively how much we think we know changes with time.
And dt/dreality is just the assumption that time progresses smoothly in reality. I think this is something to think about and we may not know currently (but I certainly see how it could use some discussion).
Again, I really appreciate the constructive feedback.
Thank you for the input, I’m an engineer and phd student in engineering so I based a lot of this on intuition, there’s an order gap for me to write something traditionally axiomatic and rigorous, but my understanding is that algebra is based on logic and problems in general, and I would like to know any logical fallacies at the very least.
Some specific comments:
The "v" described is "the amount an observer actually knows about the system", apparently measured from zero to one.
"dt/dreality": what is this supposed to mean. It's not defined anywhere in the paper