|
|
|
|
|
by scott_s
5129 days ago
|
|
And I agree, as long as we also agree that: hackers ∩ developers ≠ ∅
(The set of all hackers are not a strict subset of the set of all developers, but it's also true that some hackers - yes, in the breaking-in-to-something sense - are developers.) |
|