|
|
|
|
|
by joekrill
747 days ago
|
|
That's looking purely at the headline and a single quote that they chose for it. There is a lot more if you read the actual article. They make a case that Altman signed documents where it's quite clear the intention is to be able to claw back vested equity. And that quote in the headline isn't meant to try and attribute it directly to Altman -- but to show just how well-known the policy was. |
|