|
|
|
|
|
by usrbinbash
754 days ago
|
|
> Sodium ion batteries are doing just fine. Again, this discussion is about the as-is situation. If and when Na-ion enters mass production on a comparable scale, I will happily discuss it. > Negative energy prices at peak generation times are increasingly a thing. That does not indicate that we over-produce to a degree that would make H2 as a storage vector viable. Plus, alot of over-capacity has more to do with lagging infrastructure (e.g. Germany has enormeous problems getting SOlar power to where it is needed) than it has with actual net-overproduction. > f you’re willing to increase the cost of energy Again: Economic concerns lose lose long term to environmental and physical ones. |
|
Your complaint about hydrogen seems indefensible in light of industry forecasters all saying hydrogen is likely to grow pretty darn fast over the next two decades
> Again: Economic concerns lose lose long term to environmental and physical ones.
My dude, Economics is the allocation of scarce resources. The most efficient way per dollar to remove carbon from our systems is by definition the most efficient way to do so.
Given a fixed budget, choosing a less efficient method will result in removing carbon more slowly. Even if you want to say “fuck the budgets man”, those newly inflated budgets are still better off spent on the more efficient tools