|
|
|
|
|
by JumpCrisscross
750 days ago
|
|
> don’t know why it would be any other way; the landlord has to pay a mortgage or purchase price, and the rent must be higher than that Landlord is locked in. (They also have search, turnover and collection costs.) Tenant has flexibility. Sometimes the landlord makes money, sometimes they don't. Nothing guarantees them a return. (Ask a real-estate agent about buying an investment property. The pitch almost always turns on price appreciation.) I’m not saying buying never works for the buyer. (It looks like it might work where you are.) Just that most people buying today are transferring wealth away from themselves in exchange for emotional comfort. The notion that leasing is pissing money away is a deeply-flawed and probably-wrong theory. It’s also somewhat uniquely American (and British) middle class, which makes me suspicious about its origins. |
|
The thing that would stop me from buying right now isn’t the price, it’s the interest rate. Also one method for dramatically reducing TCO of a house without increasing the monthly payments by that much is to finance with a shorter term loan. It’s harder to get rent to win when financing with a 15 year loan.
And it’s way harder to get rent to win without the opportunity cost, especially when comparing apples to apples on space. I feel like you’re mostly talking about what’s possible but not what’s likely. You might be able to come out ahead renting but I think most people won’t. Most people at the edge of buying a house aren’t going to invest if they decide to rent instead. The choice doesn’t seem to play out as buy vs rent+invest, but more often just buy vs rent. When the choice is buy vs rent, and renting isn’t offset by investing, then it really is pissing money away, transferring wealth away faster than if they bought a house.