[glebbash]

It's funny yeah but it makes sense and is not really a problem.

You would write a compiler in the language that is the closest to your perfect. Trying to fix the original language by making a "clone" of it and adding/removing features to your liking.

That is what I want to change here by making a very simple language that if someone would like they could just fork it and add/remove the needed features instead of building one from scratch.

If this idea won't work then at least a very simple compiler would be a good learning resource, so a win win anyways.

[xonix]

Right, this is not the problem par se. To me this is a rather philosophical question. Related to the motivation behind the project.

If someone has some particular domain problem to which they need to introduce the new programming language, then, probably, it should look somehow different to all existing languages, otherwise they would be used.

Alternatively, the motivation could be: OK I need ExistingLanguageX(-alike) but in the domain/environment where it's not present yet, for example, WASM.

The motivation question is always of interest to me since it allows to judje for the long-term perspectives of the project.

However don't take this as a discouragement rant, learning case is a good motivation/raison d'être too.