Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by avmich 755 days ago
It's hard to check the calculations used, but couple of items - structural (40 t) and propulsion (38 t) - aren't clear. If some reductions are possible in these areas, they could save up to 70-80 t, bringing required payload to 120-130 t, which is close to what Starship is planned to have.

In other words, it's good to have an analysis; it would also be good to clarify existing questions to the analysis.

1 comments

For ISRU section, this work - https://www.lpi.usra.edu/meetings/roundtable2006/pdf/muscate... - is cited, 1 kg of propellant per day. Where the report authors found the mass of the system of 50 kg?