|
|
|
|
|
by signal11
753 days ago
|
|
I agree, and a lot of this applies to large companies as well. Of course larger orgs will have higher tolerance for a wider set of technologies, but this tolerance is not infinite, and choosing tech because that one team was a fan creates staffing problems over time, especially as the original devs move on. Eventually you get “estate sprawl” that’s difficult to manage. Choosing to minimise dependencies is definitely a (good) choice. The key is the right tech for the task at hand. Equally org-wide “use Oracle for everything” mandates aren’t helpful. Balancing these at a large org definitely needs good engineering leadership! |
|