|
|
|
|
|
|
by jauntywundrkind
749 days ago
|
|
|
Apologies on the Politico front. They indeed bear no resemblance to mainstream GOP stuff, have no patience for works like Don't Say Gay. I'm a little surprised to see how left accepted they are, according to https://www.allsides.com/news-source/politico-media-bias but I seem to be in the wrong here. As for confidential computing & secure enclaves, yeah, I am somewhat aware of the field. My complaint is more that this money was stealth redirected, and it seems unlikely to me to help the broader industry. This feels like a bit of a slush fund for the area for Intel. Which like, back in ARPA days was a winning ticket: find alpha geeks, give them money, & let them cook. But those geeks were also sharing & collaborating & expanding the envelope for everyone, where-as here it feels like we're probably only helping Intel or whomever else on their own efforts. |
|
|
So I've been in this space for a decadeish now after leaving the Hill, and trust me on this (or don't it's the internet. If sources wanted feel free to ask and I'll respond with Public resources) - Intel wasn't the only one.
AMD, Nvidia, IBM, Amazon, Microsoft, Qualcomm, ARM, etc all got a piece of the pie in the Secure Enclave space along with Intel.
It also isn't that secretive. If you've ever been on campus at UCB, Stanford, MIT, UIUC, CMU, UCLA, UMich, UT Austin, ASU, OSU, and UW, there's been a lot of federal funding sloshing from the Secure Enclave front.
The key difference is this started as a reaction to Supermicro a couple years ago.
> I'm a little surprised to see how left accepted they are
There are left leaning Dems, but most of us are Center Left. Most of CPC itself is more centrist than progressive.
If you lean DSA, we might not be the right party for you.