mostly not making that comment from a technical perspective. I personally have not had technical issues with Nutanix, we use it as designed: hyperconverged infra in relatively large deployments.
my comment is mostly around their financial performance. it was not too long ago they were facing some headwinds, and giving the market concerns they could be sold off. Going from those concerns, to now having substantial growth, can cause some pain points for a company
They still force you into a specific hardware organisation (hyperconverged, disks are on the compute nodes and storage is distributed) which doesn't make sense for everyone's workloads.
Also, at least a few years ago(hope it's not still the case), a lot of their services were a bunch of open source poorly stitched together with bash, and their poor abstraction over it was leaking heavily. Their APIs were also very poor (I mean, VMware's are objectively complete shit, but at least they cover almost everything; Nutanix had major gaps in API coverage).
I believe it's all Supermicro hardware. We looked into it as well (higher ed) and it was just way too expensive for their NX servers with Intel Silver CPUs.
I've heard stories that it's usually low cost to enter, but when you want more CPU/storage it's ungodly expensive.
Even the initial quote for three hosts was ridiculous for the CPUs offered.
> Even the initial quote for three hosts was ridiculous for the CPUs offered.
And storage, a few years ago they were trying to convince us that their cache is soo good, you should use spinning disks with some SSD cache. Of course they wouldn't provide any concrete numbers, and even with hybrid storage and subpar CPUs, they were a decent chunk more expensive than traditional servers with better CPUs and a dedicated full flash SAN.
Add to that the subpar (even in their demos!) software with lacking APIs, and it just seemed extremely weird to see them getting business.
Yeah, the company I work for has millions of dollars tied up in Pure storage arrays. We evaluated Nutanix and I just stopped listening after they said they don't support external storage. Huge missed opportunity for them.
my comment is mostly around their financial performance. it was not too long ago they were facing some headwinds, and giving the market concerns they could be sold off. Going from those concerns, to now having substantial growth, can cause some pain points for a company