Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by Dalewyn 753 days ago
It makes sense if you don't use politically-motivated "definitions".

Conservative is defined[1] as:

>a: tending or disposed to maintain existing views, conditions, or institutions

>b: marked by moderation or caution

>c: marked by or relating to traditional norms of taste, elegance, style, or manners

Liber/libre is the origin for words like liberal and liberty, meaning freedom. Liberal is defined[2] as:

>2 a: marked by generosity

>4: not literal or strict

>a: one who is open-minded or not strict in the observance of orthodox, traditional, or established forms or ways

[1]: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conservative

[2]: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/liberal

While they might seem at odds (one observes tradition, the other does not necessarily), they are not mutually exclusive and there is significant political overlap in espousing moderation/caution and freedom ("generosity", "not strict", "open-minded"). Small government is the most obvious form of this overlap.

Conservatism for political contexts can thus be defined as a desire to exercise a minimum (and ideally no) enforcement of powers in order to protect and guarantee people's freedoms, and a general desire to oppose change unless a change can be demonstrably warranted.

As for the saying, the older we get the harder we are set in how we live and conduct ourselves. A man builds stronger and stronger ideals and an identity that defines what is good and evil as far as he is concerned. We become more conservative as we grow older.

1 comments

Then conservatism is b.s. You'd think environmental conservation would be extremely conservative as it keeps things the way they are. But nope. The party of "individual freedom" is also the party of "don't let people do what they want in bed with consenting adults". It's a fairly arbitrary mix of policy positions adopted on each side, some in line with the principles and some contrary to.