[Fauntleroy]

If you knew someone working at an Amazon Warehouse position who needed to use government benefits to get by, would you consider them "well" or even "fairly" paid?

[missedthecue]

They either aren't working very many hours or they have a lot of dependents. There is no other way to legally qualify for government benefits even at the lowest wages Amazon pays.

If you have several children and are a single parent, should Amazon pay you 2x or 3x your childless coworkers, just to keep you off of government support?

[Fernicia]

What is your null hypothesis here? Would they be better off if Amazon moved their warehouse to another state or country?

[Fauntleroy]

The "hypothesis" is that you can, in fact, dislike it when people are criminally underpaid by corporations, even if it is supposedly a "good" wage.

[Symbiote]

Amazon can raise prices slightly.

[pornel]

Or Bezos can have fewer yachts?

[nonameloser]

The point is that amazon isn't doing anything nefarious in paying people minimum wage

[rendang]

By that logic, if we had universal health care, you could then say every single person who chooses to use it instead of buying private insurance "needs govt benefits to get by" and is therefore not well paid.