[thriftwy]

This case only became severe because they chose to award these money to compilated work with no attribution. If they didn't reward this specific work it would be a non-issue. So by induction blame lies on the offering part.

Doing subpar work is not stealing. Come on, we've been through "intellectual property" already and now this.

[Xelbair]

you are doing some heavy mental gymnastics right now. What he did was a crime, reward or not, and he should be old enough to understand why that was immoral and possible consequences of it.

aren't you affiliated with him somehow?

[thriftwy]

> What he did was a crime

No! It wasn't. I'll bet no court will agree with you.

Next question.