|
|
|
|
|
by nullc
754 days ago
|
|
From reports wright was already spending a multiple of what his opponents were spending, the risk of having to pay our legal costs was probably not a major factor in his thinking. He essentially bragged on his slack that the relative costs didn't matter as his goal was ruining his opponents by causing them costs. A relevant detail is that even though loser pays in the UK they don't pay 100%, so one can potentially make the residual they do pay ruinous. |
|