|
|
|
|
|
|
by verdverm
754 days ago
|
|
|
the analysis is more akin to analyzing with & without dropout, where a common number is to drop a random 50% of connections during a pass for training, thus forcing the model to not rely on specific nodes or connections When you look at a specific input, you can look to see what gets activated or not. Orthogonal but related ideas for inspecting the activations to see effects |
|
|