|
|
|
|
|
by 23B1
761 days ago
|
|
I'd be curious to know if this is a fair comparison. A brief search revealed little. I can see either side of the argument, and probably the result would change based on bounding conditions; for instance, how many more people have 'cameras' in their pocket today compared to 20 years ago? And a lot of chemicals in photo processing are reused over and over to develop rolls of film – maybe it's more efficient to have one central lab processing photos than a billion phone batteries going into landfill every year? |
|