|
|
|
|
|
|
by roywiggins
760 days ago
|
|
|
The implication of the article isn't that you can't produce a Turing oracle, it's that it's mathematically impossible to ever replace programmers with computers at all. The latter claim doesn't follow: programmers aren't Turing oracles either. A programming machine that can emulate whatever humans are doing when they program, would be able to program too. |
|
|