[dmd]

Yet another person who didn't even click on the article. This has nothing to do with the current generation of AI-created art.

[iteygib]

I did. It's trying to play off randomness as art, hence the generative part, and trying to subtly relate that to AI through use of abstract artists like Pollock.

It's also not new. If you've taken any modern art history class before, this is article/website is the same content. Every generation of art/artist tries to justify their existence to the last.