[nordsieck]

> This is the same reason why you can get a 65" 8K OLED TV from Samsung for "just" €2500, but you still pay €4000 for a Dell 32" 8k monitor. The market for 8k TVs is just so much bigger than 8k computer monitors.

Speaking of which... the market has this really obnoxious hole in it.

There are 32" 8k monitors and 65" 8k TVs (I think there are a few older 55" models), but there's nothing really in between.

I really hope someone either makes smaller 8k TVs or larger 8k monitors, because the situation is a little absurd. From what I can tell, 8k monitors are one of the few areas where people could be expected to notice the difference in resolution from 4k at normal viewing distances.

[varispeed]

You should be able to see the difference on a TV as well. Problem is that there is not much content shot natively at 8k or more.

[nordsieck]

I was going off of this chart[1]. It's true that some people sit relatively close to their TV, but in most of the living rooms that I've been in, the TV has been more than 6 feet away.

---

1. https://i.rtings.com/images/optimal-viewing-distance-televis...

[varispeed]

This is purely subjective. I could definitely tell the difference from more than 6ft. The picture looks just more life like.

There are people for whom it makes no difference or they don't pay attention to details. Like I have a friend who wouldn't tell 720p from 4k, unless you tell them what to look for and still they wouldn't understand what's the fuss about.